ESP vs Wallhack vs Triggerbot: Which config draws less manual review?
Closed thread Closed by archiveTrying to lock down a config that keeps me under the radar in Ascendant/Immortal lobbies. Right now im running basic 2D box ESP and low smooth aimbot, but I feel like spectators can notice aim locking even with high smoothing.
For those playing high rank: is running just a tight triggerbot less noisy than aim assist, or is 2D skeleton ESP with sound radar enough if you already have decent crosshair placement? Looking for what setups people use to look 100% legit.
comments: ESP vs Wallhack vs Triggerbot: Which config draws less manual review? 4
Replies are closedTriggerbot with a small delay (like 50-80ms) is way less noisy than aimbot if you already have good crosshair placement. Aimbot leaves traces in your mouse input movement if Vanguard is logging mouse event streams, whereas a triggerbot just simulates a mouse click when crosshair overlaps an enemy hit box.
imo full box esp gets people caught because you start tracing through walls unconsciously. keep snaplines OFF, turn off health bars, and just use corner/head point indicators. if you're checking out valorant cheat features, look for options that allow visibility checks and custom FOV circles. If your ESP renders people across the entire map, it looks unnatural on VOD reviews when you rotate early.
@NeonRacer good point about early rotations, I definitely caught myself staring at site B while holding A main yesterday haha
wallhacks don't get you banned by vanguard directly unless the memory read is detected, but player reports WILL manually ban you if you pre-fire every single angle. turn off bone lines and stick to simple head dots.
Legit config formula: FOV: under 2.0 Smoothness: 15+ Target: Chest/Neck (never 100% head) ESP: Head box only, visible check ON. Been using this setup for 5 months across two accounts without an issue.